<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>媒体观察 on Sone Blog</title><link>https://s1.work/tags/%E5%AA%92%E4%BD%93%E8%A7%82%E5%AF%9F/</link><description>Recent content in 媒体观察 on Sone Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright © 2024 Sone Blog</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 20:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://s1.work/tags/%E5%AA%92%E4%BD%93%E8%A7%82%E5%AF%9F/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>一篇报道被两个阵营同时当成武器, 问题出在哪</title><link>https://s1.work/posts/reading-44-cruel-kids-table/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 20:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://s1.work/posts/reading-44-cruel-kids-table/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;先说这篇报道的传播结局: 它的封面被美国副总统转发, 配文大意是&amp;quot;他们这是想把我们弄得很酷&amp;quot;, 两天收获十万点赞。一篇明显带批判意图的封面故事, 被批判对象当成了荣誉徽章。这个结局本身, 比文章的任何一段都更值得写作者研究。&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>